There’s not a day goes by when we don’t get bombarded with stories regarding data. After all, data seemingly comes in all shapes, sizes, and types—we hear about big data, small data, secret data, personal data, data plans, data overages, data coverage, data centers, blah, blah, blah. But, whether we like it or not, data has become the new currency of the modern age.
Key Takeaways
- Data has become deeply embedded in nearly every daily activity, from banking and shopping to social media and entertainment, making reliable data access less of a convenience and more of a basic utility.
- Mobile carriers throttling video and music streaming speeds, even under “unlimited” data plans, became increasingly common as Net Neutrality protections weakened, illustrating exactly the kind of content-based prioritization those regulations were designed to prevent.
- Municipal broadband initiatives, exemplified by Chattanooga’s status as “The Gig City,” emerged as a grassroots response to ISP throttling, with local governments building their own citywide fiber networks rather than relying entirely on national ISPs.
- The Gig.U project, formed by universities and surrounding municipalities, aimed to accelerate next-generation network deployment across university communities specifically to enable ultrafast, unrestricted data transfer rates.
- As many as 80+ cities followed Chattanooga’s lead in exploring government-owned fiber infrastructure, reflecting a broader trend of communities taking direct action to secure reliable internet access outside the traditional ISP model.
Every day, all of us connect to the world through data. Whether through social media (I’m thinking of becoming a dad-bod Instagram model), or email, or accessing bank accounts and making payments, or accessing corporate data, or watching TV, or making phone calls and shopping—everything we do is based on data consumption and creation.
And, with the latest move towards the end of net neutrality—where ISPs can throttle bandwidth based on chosen content types—the world will be looking for other ways to circumvent the issue.
For instance, as proof that net neutrality is soon to be a thing of the past, news hit just the other day that a major mobility provider replaced its $80 “unlimited data plan,” rolled out in February, with two kinds of unlimited data plans that both throttle videos, including Netflix and YouTube.
However, as terrible as that sounds to everyone who owns a mobile device of any kind, it’s not just a handful of carriers who throttle speeds and place restrictions on data. In fact, the majority of data plans now throttle video speeds after 20+ GB of data usage in a month, and even many basic unlimited plans limit video to 480p quality. Meanwhile, others don’t limit video, but instead throttle music streaming speed.
So, what is the answer? Apparently, university towns may be coming to the rescue. Over the past few years, local governments and municipalities in support of their universities have been taking it upon themselves to improve community broadband speeds.
In fact, back in 2011, a group of universities and their surrounding municipalities formed The University Community Next Generation Innovation Project, commonly referred to as Gig.U. The Project’s goal is to actively accelerate the creation and deployment of next-generation networks in the US by encouraging the development of new applications and services that can leverage ultrafast data-transfer rates.
The shining star of this new trend has been Chattanooga—now known as The Gig City—the first city in the US to have a citywide gigabit-per-second fiber internet network built entirely by its local government. But it doesn’t seem to be stopping there: as many as 80+ other cities are following suit, building their own government-owned, fiber-based internet—all created to circumvent the big national ISPs.
So, where does that leave all of us? Throttled or not, the days of net neutrality seem to be dying a slow but painful death, leaving data starved individuals to fend for themselves. But with this new grassroots movement where cities are taking it upon themselves to at least resolve the issue, services such as Netflix, YouTube, Spotify, and others, can still reach out and cater to their ever-growing audiences.
For me, it simply means that my future as an internet star is still a dream worth fighting for.
FAQs
Is Net Neutrality currently in effect?
As of 2026 there are no federal Net Neutrality rules in place. The protections discussed in this article were repealed back in 2017, and a more recent attempt by the FCC to reinstate broadband regulation was struck down by a federal appeals court (the Sixth Circuit) in January 2025, which ruled the agency lacked the statutory authority to classify broadband as a heavily regulated utility-style service. Broadband is currently treated as a lightly regulated “information service,” meaning ISPs have more latitude to manage traffic than they would under Net Neutrality rules, though the FCC still retains authority over specific areas like transparency requirements and consumer complaints. This is a fast-moving regulatory area, so the status could shift again with new legislation or further court rulings.
What is municipal broadband and why did cities start building it?
Municipal broadband refers to internet infrastructure built and owned by local governments rather than private ISPs, typically created to give communities more reliable, faster, and often less restricted internet access than what national providers offered. Cities began pursuing this model partly as a response to concerns about ISP throttling and content prioritization, particularly as Net Neutrality protections weakened, giving communities an alternative path to secure unrestricted broadband access for residents and local businesses.
How did ISPs throttle data even under “unlimited” data plans?
Many mobile carriers structured “unlimited” data plans to still limit specific types of content, commonly throttling video streaming speeds after a certain data threshold or capping video resolution at standard definition quality, while some plans throttled music streaming instead. This practice illustrated the exact concern Net Neutrality regulations were designed to address: the ability of ISPs to selectively slow down or restrict specific types of content rather than treating all internet traffic equally.

